Our Best Maybeck Evidence - The Rowland Visit Letter

Rowland and Rowland, father and son team, are the builders of our house. The father, Volney Rowland, came to visit the house in 1951, and the owners at that time, Fred and Ada Hacking, wrote a letter about the visit.

The main reason this site is called Maybe-ck or "Maybe a Maybeck" is because we believe the original house was designed by Bernard Maybeck, one of America's greatest architects. The start of this whole research quest is contained in this letter which is still our best evidence to date that the house was designed by Maybeck and not Rowland copying Maybeck's style. Rowland would be able to make something that looked like a Maybeck since he was a longtime collaborator and even built Maybeck's own Sack House in the Berkeley hills. Besides this note, we have heaps of stylistic evidence suggesting it is a Maybeck, though the conspiracy theorists would argue that it was simply Rowland copying Maybeck's sometimes odd stylistic traits down to a T.

The letter starts out with information linking the house to the letter:

Date: January 2nd, 1951

Address: 1526 Mountain Blvd., Oakland, CA 94611

People mentioned:
Mary Kingsley, Original Owner of 1526 Mountain
Fred Hacking, narrator, and Ada Hacking, wife of the narrator. Owners of 1526 Mountain at this time in 1951. Elderly gentleman, V. Rowland, original builder of the house.

"We rubbed down every board with steel brushes":

Rubbing the redwood with steel brushes eats away more of the soft wood and enhances the darker grain lines which also gives them a smooth, but choppy-water-like shape.

"I carved with my own hands the hasps and door handles":

The front door, garage doors and other doors throughout the house are carved from very hard redwood knots.

"We specially dried every board in the floors so they would not shrink and then filled the spaces with a special filler and pegged the boards with hardwood.":

The floors are about 1&1/2" thick tongue-and-groove redwood, which is an uncommon wood for flooring since it is a bit softer than Oak or Doug Fir. Where the boards are meet, there is a beveled V shape which is filled with a white putty which has the feel of old hard window glazing putty. The plugs are a deep red color, like Cherry or another furniture hardwood.

"We imported special timbers and we brought down from near Sequoia National Park the special wood for the dining room and the studio room":

The pecky cedar, discussed earlier, is salvaged from dead trees that have begun to get eaten by bugs as featured heavily in the first addition which Rowland came back from Texas to help with. If Mrs. Kingsley went to the effort of bringing Rowland back from Texas, she probably wanted to get the team back together that made the house originally and would likely have asked for Maybeck to assist with the addition as well.

"We used amber glass in the steel windows imported from Belgium at a cost of $1.50 each sheet, and there are roughly 480 sheets."

The original house has yellow glass but the rest is plain. It's been a help to see what windows are original. The yellow glass is in different shades on different sides of the house. The south side has amber colored glass that casts a strong glow. The other sides are yellow as well but less so. The steel "industrial sash" windows are a classic Maybeck features and just one of the many odd touches he liked.

"We used an overhead cable and 800lb. capacity bucket from an upper tree to the street and with a Model T. Ford for power we raised the materials, including 50 tons of rock and concrete":

Wow a model T was used for power?! Those don't have much power, but in 1927, this may have been the best way to get materials up the hill.

"He told about the fireplace and admired the way in which we improved that...":

Maybeck is known for somewhat harsh looking board formed concrete fireplaces and chimneys, including his signature venturi top which we will discuss later. The house currently has a hammered copper hood which looks really cool though it's not something that Maybeck would have done.

"When she built this home she insisted that she was going to use a lot of her own common sense and artistic ability to have it built right regardless of cost or interference. She selected her own architect, a Mr. Maybeck - a very famous artisan, and her own builder, this Mr. Rowland."

Here he clearly states that the house was designed by Maybeck. Personally, I think it would take a conspiracy theory to say that the note was a forgery or that Rowland lied about designing the house. It would be odd for Rowland to lie about designing the house, copying one of his best friends, who was still alive living in the Berkeley hills at this time.

So why wasn't Maybeck listed on the building permits?

What we know:

  • Maybeck met Rowland in the early '20s.
  • After the September '23 Berkeley hills fire that devastated a little cluster of Maybeck designed or influenced houses, Rowland and Maybeck reused burnt old growth timbers (very strong) by cleaning them with wire brushes. This is how they developed the raised grain technique featured throughout the house and the first addition, which I believe were both collaborations, the addition less so but I think based on a Maybeck sketch.
  • Maybeck had also stopped drafting at this point and instead simply focused on his "pretty little pictures" as he called them. This means Maybeck was designing the houses based mainly on design drawings, not technical drawings. It's likely that would mean, at the minimum, a floor plan and elevations, which are flat drawings of the sides of the house. He may have included a perspective drawing of the way the roof lines fit into the hillside, as his "Hillside Homes" series.
  • Maybeck trusted Rowland at this time to know how he wanted things to be done since they had already worked together for about 5 years at this point. It's possible he wasn't on the permit either because he didn't draft the plans, or because he was busy and wanted Rowland to be the point man to interact with the building inspector. Or maybe it was because the building plans that were generated from the design drawings weren't signed by Maybeck or something so it was just a simpler way to get through the bureaucracy of the Oakland Building Department.

TIMELINE: Maybeck was pretty busy at the time. He had recently finished the Phoebe Hearst Gymnasium for Women on UC Berkeley campus with architect Julia Morgan in January '27. He was working on, or finishing up two projects for Earl C. Anthony - his Packard Showroom in San Francisco and his house in Los Angeles. It would be possible to do both, at least in terms of completing the architects job, by October 10th, '27 when the Kingsley house began construction. The Packard Showroom drawings were done in '26 and the construction was completed in '27. The final plan for the Anthony house in L.A. was done in December 28.  The work on the Kingsley house went very quickly with a rough inspection 1-11-28 by the building inspector meaning the framing was worthy of inspection at that point. Framing/Plumbing/Electrical are parts of the rough inspection and 3 months is fast. Maybeck would have needed to keep working on the Anthony House in L.A. as it was a much more extensive project and was completed in 1930. He also remodeled another showroom for Anthony in '28. There appears to be a window in late '27 and early '28 when this project could have occurred between Earl Anthony projects. In the '30s he was working on the Pricipia College project and it seems there would have been time to squeeze in a sketch for Rowland by '39.

"He was called back from the South at a later date to construct the studio room. (the upper bedroom suite was constructed at a still later date)":

This describes the three phases of construction as discussed earlier. The original house, the first addition, and the 2 bedrooms and bath in the back of the house that are clearly NOT Rowland or Maybeck since they don't match the care and detail put into the rest of the house.

Side note: "We hear Mr. Maybeck is still living in Berkeley - over 80 years of age now."

As mentioned, Maybeck had shifted to drawing in '23 and built his last house in '40 in his seventies.

"He also stated that a famous artist later asked to make a painting of the interior and that Mrs. Kingsley had later presented that canvas to him and he also said that LIFE Magazine had published a several page article but that he did not have this magazine.":

I wish I could find the painting of the interior but I would probably have to search every artist in the time period under Mrs. Kingsley's ownership and I don't even know how I would find that especially if it's in a private collection or lost. A famous artist's painting of the interior of the house would be really cool to see or own! The LIFE magazine article is unfortunately just a summary of Maybeck's career in the May 17th 1948 edition.

The final page simply has instructions to the Zikmunds, the next owners of the house.

The final page simply has instructions to the Zikmunds, the next owners of the house.

Nothing of note on the final page other than the Zikmunds are the next owners of the house. That means:

  • Mrs. Kingsley owned the house from 1927-'40s.
  • The Hackings owned the house from the '40s to '51 and all additions had already been done.
  • The Zikmunds owned the house until '51-'60 and added the fireplace hood and maybe the linoleum.
  • The owners before me did the last roof in 1960 (yikes!) and sold it to me in 2015. 

IN SUMMARY: I believe Rowland and Maybeck worked on the original house. I believe the addition was done by Rowland with a sketch from Maybeck. I believe the back two bedrooms and bath were done by average contractors since they are not really very interesting or special.

Maybeck Features '39 - Why I think the first addition was based on a Maybeck sketch

In my opinion, evidence is strong that the original 1927 house was designed by Maybeck. Less certain is his possible involvement in the first addition in '39. 

If Maybeck was involved, it would have been one of the last residential projects he ever worked on before retiring and that would be consistent with his tending toward informal sketches in his older age.

The main evidence relating to Maybeck's involvement is the strong similarities to the last residential project he did, the Aiken House, 1940.

The addition consists of a 9x12' dining nook off the kitchen, a music room with a grand piano, and a detached garage. 

THE PECKY CEDAR:

image.jpg

The breakfast nook and the music room are COVERED with this odd material - boards salvaged from trees already half eaten by beetle larvae(?). The result is large passages through the wood like what you might have with a bad carpenter bee problem. Both rooms and the confirmed Maybeck Aiken House, built right after this addition, are totally covered in the stuff. He used this type of material starting in the early '30s to the end of his career. I have not seen this material used outside of his projects so it could be something he special ordered for his projects.

THE GRAND PIANO:

image.jpg
Weber serial 59XXX dates to 1905-1910. from: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weber_Piano_Company

Weber serial 59XXX dates to 1905-1910. 

from: 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weber_Piano_Company

The grand piano was built into the house, likely put in before the walls were closed since there is no other way to get it into the house. Maybeck seemed to put grand pianos in every house in the '30s. Maybe he had a piano guy with good deals...

image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg

*THE WEIRD SKYLIGHTS*:

The most interesting feature by far is the weird and ugly modernist skylights, originally made from wire glass as it says on the permit.

image.jpg
There is a little bit of the wire glass left.

There is a little bit of the wire glass left.

The Aikin house has a weird modern skylight too but it came in 1940

The Aikin house has a weird modern skylight too but it came in 1940

The reason I think this piece of evidence is very interesting is because the conspiracy theory would be Rowland, the builder, who worked with Maybeck before, just copied his style. BUT YOU CAN'T COPY SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN DONE YET!!!

THE GARAGE: 

The garage was likely built in 1940, after the additions were done. It's not on the permit for the 1939 addition but it is listed as existing on the next permit.  The reason I think it was built in '40 is it's very Maybeck looking and has a fascia rock that matches the music room that's on the permit. I'm thinking they built it right after the inspector left in 1940.

image.jpg
image.jpg
Part of the modern movement, brick and stone fascia was pretty hot in 1940-60s like on this apartment from '40 which was discussed earlier.

Part of the modern movement, brick and stone fascia was pretty hot in 1940-60s like on this apartment from '40 which was discussed earlier.

GOTHIC ARCH IN BOARD FORMED CONCRETE:

The gothic board formed concrete arch is very Maybeck. 

image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg

It occurs over and over in his work. Like here: 

image.jpg

And here: 

image.jpg

And here: 

image.jpg

 

And here: 

image.jpg

 

And here: 

image.jpg

GARAGE ROOF PATIO: 

image.jpg

 The fence above the garage can be seen on Maybeck's Wallen I house, 1933 (Caldwell book).

image.jpg

You've got to admit that is a compelling case! Or at least that there are a lot of strange coincidences.

To sum up:

-odd pecky cedar materials

-grand piano

-modern skylight

-board formed concrete gothic arch over garage

-garage top patio fenced in

Original Decorative Tile, '39 tile, '60s(?) tile

As you know if you have been following, there appears to have been three major phases of work:

1927-8: original construction, I'd guess 1200 square feet, 1 bedroom and the downstairs bathroom

1939: music room and breakfast nook added, changing room turned into master bath, probably crappy walk in master closet added (without permits and leaky) around this time (windows are single-light wood windows which would fit with this period). Garage seems to match the style of a Maybeck from this era (Wallen II house) and was probably added around this time as the rock fascia matches one put on the music room.

'50s and '60s: back bedrooms and upstairs bath ('50s I think), and linoleum in the kitchen and the last new roof '60s (last owner told me this). Also, I think the crappy master bedroom walk in closet probably had cabinets added because they cover the windows.

I have overlaid the permit records with the date of plumbing fixtures and rough estimates for stylistic features as well as information from the owner who grew up here whose parents bought it in 1960. He told me they did the roof at that time and added the linoleum in the kitchen. All the other work seems to line up with the three permits. 

Using the story I've put together, I can break the bathroom tile into three phases as well. 

1927: original downstairs bath tub and floor tile. In the notes it says the tiles are from Tunisia. 

LOVE these tiles. One of the features that sold me on the house  

LOVE these tiles. One of the features that sold me on the house  

I did an image search for Tunisian tiles and found this: 

The 1929 Santa Barbara Courthouse has one of the same tiles! It's not the exact same tile, but so similar. I think it's like Mexican crafts sold on the street - everyone makes their own clone of the same hand-painted maracas or more recently NFL themed day of the dead masks.

It appears that these Tunisian tiles were popular during the late '20s. 

Tunisian and Moroccan tiles are more the "Arabian" style of hand-painted decorative tiles than the hand-painted decorative Mexican tiles known as Talavera tiles. I was looking at both and though decorative tiles and terracotta tiles are common in both cultures, they have a notably different "feel." My house has North African style and therefore I should use that type when tiling the master bath.

For reference, these are more Mexican looking tiles at Import Tile in Berkeley

For reference, these are more Mexican looking tiles at Import Tile in Berkeley

1939-40: These tiles may have been added later as they don't totally match the originals:

Here the circa '40 tile is next to a 4&1/4" square Dal-Tile spa tile. 

Here the circa '40 tile is next to a 4&1/4" square Dal-Tile spa tile. 

It seems odd the decorative tiles match ONLY above the floor. The clay tiles also seem a bit different color than the floor. This and other reasons make me think this base tile was part of a bathroom overhaul in '39

It seems odd the decorative tiles match ONLY above the floor. The clay tiles also seem a bit different color than the floor. This and other reasons make me think this base tile was part of a bathroom overhaul in '39

These tiles, and the 6x6" red clay quarry tiles (terracotta), were added to:​

-original bath as base tiles (like a baseboard)​ and around the tub which  may have had a low shower head added at this time

-behind the range as a backsplash​

image.jpg

-laundry sink backsplash​

image.jpg

It's possible that they are original but it seems odd the same accent tiles wouldn't be used throughout the original lower bath. 

I had to repair the range backsplash so I had to take off some tiles. The red clay quarry tiles were labeled "CARLYLE MADE IN U.S.A." and are very similar to the Red Blaze Quarry Tile made by Dal-Tile today. They probably used to be the same color too but they're porous and darken with age.

 Lighter tiles are new Dal-Tile quarry tiles

 

Lighter tiles are new Dal-Tile quarry tiles

'50s/'60s: some effort was put in to match the original bathroom tiles in the upstairs bathroom. But they are yet a third type of 6x6 clay tiles and accent tiles

Decorative tile is "hmmmm..."

Decorative tile is "hmmmm..."

They used Italian thin clay tiles and probably Dal-Tile trim pieces to match original but the accent tiles seem... off. 

I know these are a third type of tile because I found extras. The clay tiles are the thinner, more modern kind from Italy. 

I know these are a third type of tile because I found extras. The clay tiles are the thinner, more modern kind from Italy. 

Modern Italian clay tiles are thinner than the old clay tiles which are very thick  

Modern Italian clay tiles are thinner than the old clay tiles which are very thick  

 

Finally, the mid-century mosaic tiles. 

The wall tile looks '40 but the floor tile looks '60 as well as the shower door

The wall tile looks '40 but the floor tile looks '60 as well as the shower door

This marble linoleum tile was added at some point. It's over 1/4" ply which may be on top of wood or... 

This marble linoleum tile was added at some point. It's over 1/4" ply which may be on top of wood or... 

Here is the mid-century bath.  The tile is made to match the lower bath but the trim is definitely mid-century

Here is the mid-century bath.  The tile is made to match the lower bath but the trim is definitely mid-century

The door and shower pan match the master bath and both seem wrong for the house 

The door and shower pan match the master bath and both seem wrong for the house 

So there you have it! 3 phases of work, three sets of tiles, and some other crap thrown in too! I'm doing this research to help develop my design for the master bath tile and upper bath shower repair. I am looking for consistency here! I need to unify the design of the house. A big part of my job when working on old houses is to peel back the dated, halfbaked "improvements" and to remodel and restore the house by using the original style as a guide as much as possible. I think Maybeck had a hand in the '39 addition so I will respect those features as well. I have decided to make the master bathroom look '27 even though it was originally a changing room. I'm looking forward to that!

The tub I want to add to the master bath from VintageTub.com

The tub I want to add to the master bath from VintageTub.com